Ennis District Court Judge Dismisses 98 Go Safe Speeding Cases

Almost 100 mainly Clare-based motorists accused of speeding yesterday escaped any sanction after a judge dismissed all 'Go Safe’ cases against them.

At Ennis District Court, Judge Patrick Durcan dismissed 98 'Go Safe' prosecutions against the motorists accused of speeding on two legal grounds.

CONTINUE READING BELOW

In a fresh blow to the 'Go Safe' system, Judge Durcan dismissed the cases over the failure of the Go Safe personnel in court to provide evidence that they were authorised to give evidence on behalf of Insp John McDonald, who heads up the Garda Fixed Charge Processing Unit.

Judge Durcan- who has who has been a staunch critic of the way the Go Safe prosecutions are brought to court – adjourned months of Go Safe prosecutions into yesterday’s date due to a High Court challenge.

Judge Durcan also dismissed the 98 cases after ruling that the Go Safe employees couldn’t give any evidence as to whether the fixed charge notice was paid or not.

Surveying the packed courtroom that included around 12 Go Safe staff, Judge Durcan said that “Insp McDonald is out in force today with the artillery”.

The fleet of around 50 Go Safe vans is operated by an Isle of Man firm that last year put the profits it makes off limits by changing its status to that of an unlimited company.

The Go Safe consortium secured the €80 million Garda Siochana contract to operate the speed camera vans in 2009 and was recording operating profits of around €50,000 per week in 2012.

Judge Durcan dismissed the cases yesterday followed a test case brought by Ennis solicitor, Daragh Hassett on behalf of one of his clients.

Speaking after court yesterday, Mr Hassett said that the cases were dismissed “after I exploited flaws in the legislation enacted to outsource the prosecution of speeding offences”.

He said: “There is no argument that speeding on our roads is not welcome but our citizens are entitled to due process and fair procedures when they face a day in court. If the State in its wisdom is outsourcing important Garda duties to a private off shore company then the same principles and duties that the Gardai are bound by must apply. To date that has not been my experience of this set up.”

Mr Hassett said that the Road Traffic Act 2010 facilitates the outsourcing of detecting motorists speeding to the Isle of Man firm.

He said that it “was unnecessary and ill thought and for operational purposes it shows that members of the public namely the employees of this private company Go Safe are ill equipped to properly prosecute a criminal matter”.

He said: “They should not be asked to even attempt to replicate the expertise that experienced Gardai have brought to this role on a daily basis for many years. Its genesis may have been as a cost cutting measure but as you can see as a consequence of these flaws – only some of which I needed to highlight today -the cheaper alternative doesn't always replicate the original."

Judge Durcan dismissed the cases yesterday on only two points raised by Mr Hassett.

Mr Hassett said: “There are I believe other significant flaws in how Go Safe speeding cases operate and I may have to raise them at a future date if the case requires.”

In March, Judge Durcan described as a complete waste of money Go Safe staff coming to court failing to prosecute alleged speeding motorists "for one bad reason after another”.